At Rula, our platform provides the technical ability to review a patient's clinical records, which can be a helpful tool to inform deeper clinical conceptualization and monitor ongoing clinical risk for continuity of care. However, having the technical ability to access this information does not always mean it is clinically appropriate to do so.
To maintain the objectivity of your assessments, ensure the integrity of the therapeutic relationship, and prevent the accidental disclosure of sensitive information, Rula’s Clinical Quality team recommends a thoughtful approach when navigating past records and other providers’ documentation.
General Guidance for All Providers
Whether you are working with individuals, families, or couples, these foundational best practices help safeguard patient trust and your own clinical objectivity:
Patient Autonomy and Consent
It is considered best practice to discuss record-sharing with your client during your initial intake session. Be sure to communicate to the patient that you have access to their previous Rula notes, or the notes of other concurrent providers. This simple step fosters transparency from the outset. Gaining their consent prior to accessing such records can help build deep trust and honor their autonomy.
Initial Assessment and Clinical Conception
As a general practice, we recommend delaying a deep dive into historical records until after your first session. This allows you to form an independent clinical conception of the client based on your own current observations, without being preemptively influenced by another provider’s lens. However, patient safety always takes precedence; for high-risk or complex cases, reviewing previous records prior to the first session may be necessary to ensure immediate continuity of care and safety mitigation.
Clinical Judgment
Ultimately, we encourage you to use your best clinical judgment. Please remember that a patient may not be ready to disclose certain details to you right away. Reviewing notes prematurely risks exposing you to sensitive information that the patient has not yet chosen to bring into your shared therapeutic space.
Special Considerations for Couples Therapy
The risks of reviewing historical data are particularly high when working with couples. Managing "asymmetric information" (where you know something about one partner that the other partner may not know) can create significant ethical and clinical challenges.
You may have technical access to another provider's notes if the primary patient in the couple dyad already sees an individual therapist or psychiatric prescriber at Rula, and you are now providing couples therapy with that same individual.
Keep in mind that individual therapy records are viewed through a single lens. Accessing a primary patient's individual history can inadvertently skew your perspective, since you won't have the same background context for their partner. Always anchor your chart reviews in the understanding that, in couples therapy, you are treating the relationship itself.
Best Practice Recommendation
- Default to Not Reviewing: It is generally recommended not to review individual therapy or psychiatry notes for your couples cases, even when you technically have access.
- Obtain Verbal Agreement: If you believe it is clinically necessary to review past or concurrent notes, it is best practice to verbally disclose this intention to the patient and obtain their verbal agreement. If they express hesitation, take the time to explore that hesitation together within your sessions.
- To learn more about best practices regarding couples therapy, please review the Step‑by‑Step Workflow for Seeing Couples at Rula.
Deciding to Review Notes
If your clinical judgment determines that accessing collateral or historical notes is necessary for the care of your patient(s), please carefully consider how this choice will impact your ongoing clinical neutrality and the therapeutic alliance.
When proceeding, take the following steps:
- Document your rationale: Clearly note your clinical reasoning for accessing and reviewing the collateral records in a neutral, concise way within your progress notes.
- Seek consultation: When in doubt, seek consultation before accessing collateral notes for complex or couples' cases.
| Important Note: NEVER directly disclose or read information from a historical or concurrent record directly to the client or partner during a session. Reviewing the client’s record is meant strictly to inform your clinical conceptualization and risk monitoring. Prematurely revealing or discussing clinical details from other records can profoundly compromise the therapeutic alliance, breach clinical neutrality, and risks significant ethical and clinical harm. |
Conclusion
Ultimately, balancing Rula’s technical capabilities with clinical intentionality is essential to providing high-quality, ethical care. By prioritizing client autonomy, forming your own independent assessments first, and navigating historical data with heightened sensitivity, you protect your clinical objectivity. Rula is committed to supporting your clinical autonomy while providing the best-practice guardrails necessary to maintain the highest standards of care.
If you have any questions regarding these recommendations or wish to discuss a specific case, please feel free to reach out to the Clinical Quality team.
Updated